State testing in schools has become a huge debate. We spend months preparing for these tests, and then the results don’t even seem to matter. This is a relevant issue for all students, teachers, and parents. It’s important because it affects our education and how schools are evaluated. The audience is students, teachers, administrators, and state education officials.

     My stance is that we need to re-evaluate the role and impact of state testing. I have evidence to back this up. Many students feel stressed and anxious about these tests, and some studies suggest that they don’t accurately measure student learning. Plus, teachers often have to “teach to the test,” which can narrow the curriculum. The headline: “Testing Overload: Is State Testing Helping or Hurting Our Schools?” It’s thought-provoking and captures the essence of the debate. Some state tests are harder to pass for some students, which can be very discouraging, especially when taking a state test over and over and still not passing. 

       I aim to present a balanced view, acknowledging the pros and cons of state testing while emphasizing the need for reform. The editorial will discuss the purpose of state testing, its impact on students and teachers, and alternative assessment methods. The goal is to have a discussion and encourage state education officials to consider changes to the testing system. Because our education should be about more than just passing a test.